Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions

Mauritius
0.1893 kt
in 2050
New Caledonia
0.2274 kt
in 2050
Mauritius rank
155th
New Caledonia rank
152nd

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Caledonia
0.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.2274 kt against 0.1893 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0381 kt.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 155th and New Caledonia ranks 152nd of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0797 kt 0.193 kt 0.1133 kt New Caledonia
1970s 0.0733 kt 0.2105 kt 0.1372 kt New Caledonia
1980s 0.0837 kt 0.2146 kt 0.1309 kt New Caledonia
1990s 0.1148 kt 0.204 kt 0.0892 kt New Caledonia
2000s 0.1307 kt 0.1811 kt 0.0504 kt New Caledonia
2010s 0.1582 kt 0.1559 kt 0.0023 kt Mauritius
2020s 0.1711 kt 0.1446 kt 0.0265 kt Mauritius
2030s 0.1733 kt 0.1986 kt 0.0253 kt New Caledonia
2050s 0.1893 kt 0.2274 kt 0.0381 kt New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.2274 kt against 0.1893 kt in Mauritius as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
0.0381 kt, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Mauritius ranks 155th and New Caledonia ranks 152nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mauritius/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/mauritius/new-caledonia/">Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf