Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions

Papua New Guinea
0.2313 kt
in 2050
Trinidad and Tobago
0.2601 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea rank
151st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
149th

Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.2601 kt against 0.2313 kt in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0288 kt.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 151st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0726 kt 0.1034 kt 0.0308 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.1978 kt 0.1435 kt 0.0543 kt Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.2026 kt 0.148 kt 0.0546 kt Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.1618 kt 0.1316 kt 0.0302 kt Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.1618 kt 0.188 kt 0.0262 kt Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.1652 kt 0.2261 kt 0.0609 kt Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.1638 kt 0.2526 kt 0.0889 kt Trinidad and Tobago
2030s 0.1997 kt 0.2539 kt 0.0542 kt Trinidad and Tobago
2050s 0.2313 kt 0.2601 kt 0.0288 kt Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — direct emissions, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.2601 kt against 0.2313 kt in Papua New Guinea as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — direct emissions between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0288 kt, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for manure left on pasture — direct emissions?
Papua New Guinea ranks 151st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/papua-new-guinea/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/papua-new-guinea/trinidad-and-tobago/">Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf