Australia and New Zealand vs China, mainland: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
42,632 kt
in 2050
China, mainland
92,579 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th
China, mainland rank
4th

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • China, mainland
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196120052050

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 92,579 kt against 42,632 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 49,947 kt.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 2.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and China, mainland ranks 4th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and China, mainland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand China, mainland Difference Ahead
1960s 40,629 kt 27,336 kt 13,293 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 46,076 kt 32,150 kt 13,926 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 42,912 kt 37,252 kt 5,660 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 41,360 kt 51,973 kt 10,613 kt China, mainland
2000s 37,435 kt 58,299 kt 20,864 kt China, mainland
2010s 33,507 kt 54,079 kt 20,571 kt China, mainland
2020s 31,710 kt 57,716 kt 26,007 kt China, mainland
2030s 41,956 kt 82,128 kt 40,172 kt China, mainland
2050s 42,632 kt 92,579 kt 49,946 kt China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or China, mainland?
China, mainland, at 92,579 kt against 42,632 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and China, mainland?
49,947 kt, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and China, mainland?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and China, mainland rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and China, mainland ranks 4th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs China, mainland: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/china-mainland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/china-mainland/">Australia and New Zealand vs China, mainland: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf