China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
1.38 kt
in 2050
Kiribati
0.212 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
189th
Kiribati rank
191st

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Kiribati
051015196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1.38 kt against 0.212 kt in Kiribati, a difference of 1.17 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 6.5 times Kiribati's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Kiribati ranks 191st of 195 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 8.84 kt 0.0177 kt 8.82 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 13.14 kt 0.0265 kt 13.12 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 14.34 kt 0.0265 kt 14.31 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 8.27 kt 0.0265 kt 8.25 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 3.5 kt 0.0583 kt 3.44 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 6.19 kt 0.0795 kt 6.11 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 8.53 kt 0.0795 kt 8.45 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 1.22 kt 0.1325 kt 1.09 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 1.38 kt 0.212 kt 1.17 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Kiribati?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1.38 kt against 0.212 kt in Kiribati as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
1.17 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kiribati rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Kiribati ranks 191st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/kiribati/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf