Small Island Developing States (SIDS) vs South Africa: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5)

Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
8,031 kt
in 2050
South Africa
10,891 kt
in 2050
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) rank
31st
South Africa rank
28th

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) (CO2eq AR5) over time

  • Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
  • South Africa
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196120052050

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 10,891 kt against 8,031 kt in Small Island Developing States (SIDS), a difference of 2,860 kt.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times Small Island Developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 65 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 28th of 33 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small Island Developing States (SIDS) South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 4,777 kt 8,061 kt 3,283 kt South Africa
1970s 5,036 kt 7,833 kt 2,797 kt South Africa
1980s 5,294 kt 7,955 kt 2,661 kt South Africa
1990s 5,602 kt 8,328 kt 2,726 kt South Africa
2000s 5,676 kt 8,383 kt 2,706 kt South Africa
2010s 6,019 kt 8,205 kt 2,186 kt South Africa
2020s 5,905 kt 7,499 kt 1,595 kt South Africa
2030s 6,961 kt 9,978 kt 3,018 kt South Africa
2050s 8,031 kt 10,891 kt 2,860 kt South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq), Small Island Developing States (SIDS) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 10,891 kt against 8,031 kt in Small Island Developing States (SIDS) as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) between Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and South Africa?
2,860 kt, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and South Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and South Africa rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq)?
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 28th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small Island Developing States (SIDS) vs South Africa: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/small-island-developing-states-sids/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/small-island-developing-states-sids/south-africa/">Small Island Developing States (SIDS) vs South Africa: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf