Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 194,547 kt against 42,632 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 151,915 kt.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.6 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 65 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 228 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40,629 kt | 63,162 kt | 22,533 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 46,076 kt | 73,001 kt | 26,925 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 42,912 kt | 85,484 kt | 42,572 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 41,360 kt | 103,466 kt | 62,106 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 37,435 kt | 136,924 kt | 99,489 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 33,507 kt | 183,893 kt | 150,386 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 31,710 kt | 218,844 kt | 187,134 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 41,956 kt | 156,384 kt | 114,428 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 42,632 kt | 194,547 kt | 151,915 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 194,547 kt against 42,632 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 151,915 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf