Ecuador vs Mauritania: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Ecuador
3,611 kt
in 2050
Mauritania
3,817 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
51st
Mauritania rank
50th

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 3,817 kt against 3,611 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 206 kt.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 51st and Mauritania ranks 50th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 990.86 kt 1,597 kt 605.86 kt Mauritania
1970s 1,193 kt 1,264 kt 70.74 kt Mauritania
1980s 1,648 kt 1,302 kt 346.04 kt Ecuador
1990s 2,291 kt 1,563 kt 728.64 kt Ecuador
2000s 2,257 kt 2,093 kt 164.23 kt Ecuador
2010s 2,102 kt 2,435 kt 333.5 kt Mauritania
2020s 1,845 kt 2,641 kt 796.26 kt Mauritania
2030s 3,105 kt 3,121 kt 16.27 kt Mauritania
2050s 3,611 kt 3,817 kt 205.7 kt Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 3,817 kt against 3,611 kt in Ecuador as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Ecuador and Mauritania?
206 kt, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Ecuador ranks 51st and Mauritania ranks 50th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf