Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs New Zealand: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) (CO2eq N2O)

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
12,334 kt
in 2050
New Zealand
11,174 kt
in 2050
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
24th
New Zealand rank
26th

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) (CO2eq N2O) over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • New Zealand
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k196120052050

How they compare

Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 12,334 kt against 11,174 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 1,160 kt.

That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 26th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 3,994 kt 10,624 kt 6,630 kt New Zealand
1970s 4,322 kt 11,972 kt 7,649 kt New Zealand
1980s 5,491 kt 12,643 kt 7,152 kt New Zealand
1990s 6,898 kt 10,970 kt 4,072 kt New Zealand
2000s 7,451 kt 10,163 kt 2,711 kt New Zealand
2010s 6,734 kt 9,429 kt 2,695 kt New Zealand
2020s 7,359 kt 8,793 kt 1,434 kt New Zealand
2030s 10,515 kt 11,198 kt 682.8 kt New Zealand
2050s 12,334 kt 11,174 kt 1,160 kt Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or New Zealand?
Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 12,334 kt against 11,174 kt in New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and New Zealand?
1,160 kt, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and New Zealand?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and New Zealand rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 26th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs New Zealand: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/iran-islamic-republic-of/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/iran-islamic-republic-of/new-zealand/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs New Zealand: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf