Guatemala vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square

Guatemala
0.0163 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0162 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
36th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
37th

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0050.0070.010.0130.0150.018196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0163 kt per square kilometre against 0.0162 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Guatemala ranks 36th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0056 kt per square kilometre 0.0066 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0062 kt per square kilometre 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.008 kt per square kilometre 0.0094 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0091 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0107 kt per square kilometre 0.0119 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0141 kt per square kilometre 0.0142 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.016 kt per square kilometre 0.0159 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square, Guatemala or Trinidad and Tobago?
Guatemala, at 0.0163 kt per square kilometre against 0.0162 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square between Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square?
Guatemala ranks 36th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/trinidad-and-tobago/">Guatemala vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.