Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Singapore
0.0099 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0099 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
64th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
61st

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Singapore
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0099 kt per square kilometre against 0.0099 kt per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 64th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 61st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0172 kt per square kilometre 0.0117 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 0.0258 kt per square kilometre 0.0112 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0162 kt per square kilometre 0.0146 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0076 kt per square kilometre 0.0133 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0092 kt per square kilometre 0.0149 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0111 kt per square kilometre 0.0084 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0101 kt per square kilometre 0.0087 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre, Singapore or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0099 kt per square kilometre against 0.0099 kt per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre between Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions (co2eq), per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 64th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 61st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/singapore/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-co2eq-per-square-kilometre/singapore/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Singapore vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.