Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O)
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
How they compare
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 1,016 kt against 160.88 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 855.12 kt.
That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 6.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 65 years both countries report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 228 countries.
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 153.32 kt | 348.93 kt | 195.61 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1970s | 173.87 kt | 402.35 kt | 228.48 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1980s | 161.93 kt | 462.81 kt | 300.87 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 1990s | 156.07 kt | 553.34 kt | 397.27 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2000s | 141.27 kt | 705.72 kt | 564.45 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2010s | 126.44 kt | 915.32 kt | 788.87 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2020s | 119.66 kt | 1,062 kt | 942.42 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2030s | 158.32 kt | 828.44 kt | 670.12 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2050s | 160.88 kt | 1,016 kt | 855.18 kt | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 1,016 kt against 160.88 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 855.12 kt, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf