China vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions

China
350.74 kt
in 2050
Latin America and the Caribbean
873.57 kt
in 2050
China rank
3rd
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
6th

Manure left on Pasture — Emissions over time

  • China
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
0200400600800196120052050

How they compare

Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 873.57 kt against 350.74 kt in China, a difference of 522.83 kt.

That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 2.5 times China's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 6th of 195 countries.

Latin America and the Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latin America and the Caribbean Difference Ahead
1960s 103.71 kt 356.67 kt 252.96 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1970s 121.92 kt 441.22 kt 319.3 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1980s 141.37 kt 520.72 kt 379.35 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
1990s 197.22 kt 573.11 kt 375.89 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2000s 221.14 kt 648.23 kt 427.09 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2010s 205.07 kt 686.49 kt 481.42 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2020s 218.84 kt 734.81 kt 515.98 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2030s 311.17 kt 800.82 kt 489.64 kt Latin America and the Caribbean
2050s 350.74 kt 873.57 kt 522.83 kt Latin America and the Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions, China or Latin America and the Caribbean?
Latin America and the Caribbean, at 873.57 kt against 350.74 kt in China as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions between China and Latin America and the Caribbean?
522.83 kt, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latin America and the Caribbean?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China and Latin America and the Caribbean rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions?
China ranks 3rd and Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 6th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/">China vs Latin America and the Caribbean: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf