Oceania vs Sudan: Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O)
Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Oceania
- Sudan
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 163.22 kt against 78.92 kt in Sudan, a difference of 84.3 kt.
That makes Oceania's figure about 2.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 17th and Sudan ranks 16th of 33 groups.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 127.45 kt | 78.77 kt | 48.69 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 120.81 kt | 79.39 kt | 41.42 kt | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure left on pasture — emissions, Oceania or Sudan?
- Oceania, at 163.22 kt against 78.92 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure left on pasture — emissions between Oceania and Sudan?
- 84.3 kt, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Sudan rank globally for manure left on pasture — emissions?
- Oceania ranks 17th and Sudan ranks 16th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf