Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 159.61 kt against 37.94 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 121.67 kt.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 65 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 228 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38.93 kt | 50.54 kt | 11.61 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 42.09 kt | 58.33 kt | 16.24 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 40.14 kt | 68.51 kt | 28.36 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 37.68 kt | 83.2 kt | 45.52 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 32.38 kt | 110.46 kt | 78.07 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 27.93 kt | 149.28 kt | 121.35 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 26.4 kt | 178.85 kt | 152.44 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 37.19 kt | 127.6 kt | 90.41 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 37.94 kt | 159.61 kt | 121.66 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 159.61 kt against 37.94 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 121.67 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf