Botswana vs Saudi Arabia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Botswana
1.3 kt
in 2050
Saudi Arabia
1.4 kt
in 2050
Botswana rank
94th
Saudi Arabia rank
91st

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Botswana
  • Saudi Arabia
01234196120052050

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.4 kt against 1.3 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0.1 kt.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 91st of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4645 kt 0.3091 kt 0.1554 kt Botswana
1970s 0.748 kt 0.5493 kt 0.1987 kt Botswana
1980s 0.8562 kt 1.06 kt 0.2076 kt Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.8792 kt 1.35 kt 0.4723 kt Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.8261 kt 1.55 kt 0.7221 kt Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.6584 kt 1.72 kt 1.06 kt Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.4177 kt 3.19 kt 2.77 kt Saudi Arabia
2030s 1.12 kt 1.3 kt 0.1816 kt Saudi Arabia
2050s 1.3 kt 1.4 kt 0.0993 kt Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, Botswana or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 1.4 kt against 1.3 kt in Botswana as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between Botswana and Saudi Arabia?
0.1 kt, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Saudi Arabia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Botswana and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
Botswana ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 91st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Saudi Arabia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/botswana/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/botswana/saudi-arabia/">Botswana vs Saudi Arabia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf