Burundi vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions

Burundi
0.5075 kt
in 2050
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0.5851 kt
in 2050
Burundi rank
100th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
97th

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions over time

  • Burundi
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0.20.40.60.8196120052050

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 0.5851 kt against 0.5075 kt in Burundi, a difference of 0.0776 kt.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Burundi ranks 100th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 97th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2004 kt 0.5479 kt 0.3476 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1970s 0.2925 kt 0.6223 kt 0.3298 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1980s 0.2302 kt 0.7302 kt 0.4999 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1990s 0.2273 kt 0.7438 kt 0.5165 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s 0.258 kt 0.6464 kt 0.3884 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 0.5458 kt 0.6548 kt 0.1089 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 0.7226 kt 0.6029 kt 0.1198 kt Burundi
2030s 0.3951 kt 0.6244 kt 0.2293 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2050s 0.5075 kt 0.5851 kt 0.0776 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, Burundi or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 0.5851 kt against 0.5075 kt in Burundi as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between Burundi and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
0.0776 kt, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Burundi and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
Burundi ranks 100th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 97th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/burundi/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/burundi/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Burundi vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf