China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.0011 kt
in 2050
Malta
0.0042 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
189th
Malta rank
186th

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Malta
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196120052050

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0042 kt against 0.0011 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0031 kt.

That makes Malta's figure about 3.8 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Malta ranks 186th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0059 kt 0.0057 kt 0.0002 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0088 kt 0.0039 kt 0.0049 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.0096 kt 0.0033 kt 0.0064 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.0056 kt 0.0051 kt 0.0005 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.0025 kt 0.0044 kt 0.0019 kt Malta
2010s 0.0043 kt 0.0037 kt 0.0006 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.0058 kt 0.0036 kt 0.0022 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.001 kt 0.0045 kt 0.0035 kt Malta
2050s 0.0011 kt 0.0042 kt 0.0031 kt Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Malta?
Malta, at 0.0042 kt against 0.0011 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
0.0031 kt, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 189th and Malta ranks 186th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/malta/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf