China, Macao SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions

China, Macao SAR
0.0032 kt
in 2050
Kiribati
0.0001 kt
in 2050
China, Macao SAR rank
188th
Kiribati rank
191st

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Kiribati
00.0010.0020.003196120052050

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.0032 kt against 0.0001 kt in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0031 kt.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 32.0 times Kiribati's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Macao SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Macao SAR ranks 188th and Kiribati ranks 191st of 195 countries.

China, Macao SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt 0 kt 0.0003 kt China, Macao SAR
1970s 0.0005 kt 0 kt 0.0005 kt China, Macao SAR
1980s 0.0006 kt 0 kt 0.0006 kt China, Macao SAR
1990s 0.0006 kt 0 kt 0.0006 kt China, Macao SAR
2000s 0.0008 kt 0 kt 0.0008 kt China, Macao SAR
2010s 0.0009 kt 0 kt 0.0009 kt China, Macao SAR
2020s 0.0009 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0008 kt China, Macao SAR
2030s 0.0018 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0017 kt China, Macao SAR
2050s 0.0032 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0031 kt China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, China, Macao SAR or Kiribati?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.0032 kt against 0.0001 kt in Kiribati as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between China, Macao SAR and Kiribati?
0.0031 kt, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Kiribati?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Macao SAR and Kiribati rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
China, Macao SAR ranks 188th and Kiribati ranks 191st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-macao-sar/kiribati/">China, Macao SAR vs Kiribati: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf