Ecuador vs Uzbekistan: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)

Ecuador
2.51 kt
in 2050
Uzbekistan
2.19 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
70th
Uzbekistan rank
73rd

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Uzbekistan
1234196120052050

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2.51 kt against 2.19 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.32 kt.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 70th and Uzbekistan ranks 73rd of 228 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 1.71 kt 1.37 kt 0.3417 kt Ecuador
2000s 1.6 kt 1.59 kt 0.0034 kt Ecuador
2010s 1.45 kt 2.78 kt 1.33 kt Uzbekistan
2020s 1.26 kt 3.47 kt 2.21 kt Uzbekistan
2030s 2.16 kt 1.99 kt 0.169 kt Ecuador
2050s 2.51 kt 2.19 kt 0.3211 kt Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, Ecuador or Uzbekistan?
Ecuador, at 2.51 kt against 2.19 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between Ecuador and Uzbekistan?
0.32 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uzbekistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
Ecuador ranks 70th and Uzbekistan ranks 73rd of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Uzbekistan: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ecuador/uzbekistan/">Ecuador vs Uzbekistan: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf