El Salvador vs Georgia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions

El Salvador
0.6267 kt
in 2050
Georgia
0.684 kt
in 2050
El Salvador rank
93rd
Georgia rank
92nd

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions over time

  • El Salvador
  • Georgia
0.20.30.40.50.60.7196120052050

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.684 kt against 0.6267 kt in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0573 kt.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 93rd and Georgia ranks 92nd of 195 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.326 kt 0.4596 kt 0.1335 kt Georgia
2000s 0.3555 kt 0.5004 kt 0.1448 kt Georgia
2010s 0.2811 kt 0.4717 kt 0.1906 kt Georgia
2020s 0.2218 kt 0.4279 kt 0.2061 kt Georgia
2030s 0.4833 kt 0.6127 kt 0.1294 kt Georgia
2050s 0.6267 kt 0.684 kt 0.0573 kt Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, El Salvador or Georgia?
Georgia, at 0.684 kt against 0.6267 kt in El Salvador as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between El Salvador and Georgia?
0.0573 kt, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
El Salvador ranks 93rd and Georgia ranks 92nd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Georgia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/georgia/">El Salvador vs Georgia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf