Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions

Russian Federation
4.11 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
3.96 kt
in 2050
Russian Federation rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Zimbabwe
246810196120052050

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 4.11 kt against 3.96 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.15 kt.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 195 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6.4 kt 1.78 kt 4.62 kt Russian Federation
2000s 3.66 kt 1.97 kt 1.69 kt Russian Federation
2010s 3.68 kt 2.13 kt 1.55 kt Russian Federation
2020s 3.38 kt 2.27 kt 1.11 kt Russian Federation
2030s 4.02 kt 3 kt 1.03 kt Russian Federation
2050s 4.11 kt 3.96 kt 0.1464 kt Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, Russian Federation or Zimbabwe?
Russian Federation, at 4.11 kt against 3.96 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions between Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
0.15 kt, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Russian Federation and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions?
Russian Federation ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/russian-federation-2/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/russian-federation-2/zimbabwe/">Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf