How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Jordan: Manure left on Pasture: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square

Ecuador

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Jordan

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador rank

92nd

Jordan rank

95th

Manure left on Pasture: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square over time

Ecuador
Jordan

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 92nd and Jordan ranks 95th of 170 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
1970s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
1980s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
1990s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
2000s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador
2020s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Jordan?: Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Jordan?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre?: Ecuador ranks 92nd and Jordan ranks 95th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jordan: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/">Ecuador vs Jordan: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 17 August 2026

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.