Ecuador vs Romania: Manure left on Pasture: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
92nd
Romania rank
93rd

Manure left on Pasture: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
00000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 92nd and Romania ranks 93rd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Romania?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Romania?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 92nd and Romania ranks 93rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Romania: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/">Ecuador vs Romania: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.