Ecuador vs South Africa: Manure left on Pasture: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
92nd
South Africa rank
91st

Manure left on Pasture: Indirect emissions (N2O) … Indirect square over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
000000196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 92nd and South Africa ranks 91st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre, Ecuador or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre between Ecuador and South Africa?
0 kt per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 92nd and South Africa ranks 91st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.