Australia vs Cambodia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP

Australia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cambodia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
74th
Cambodia rank
76th

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • Cambodia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Cambodia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cambodia ahead.

Australia ranks 74th and Cambodia ranks 76th of 169 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cambodia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cambodia
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cambodia
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp, Australia or Cambodia?
Australia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp between Australia and Cambodia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cambodia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Australia and Cambodia rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 74th and Cambodia ranks 76th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cambodia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/cambodia/">Australia vs Cambodia: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,139 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.