Congo vs Ecuador: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP

Congo
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Ecuador
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Congo rank
83rd
Ecuador rank
81st

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time

  • Congo
  • Ecuador
00000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 81st of 169 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp, Congo or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp between Congo and Ecuador?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for manure left on pasture — indirect emissions, per unit of gdp?
Congo ranks 83rd and Ecuador ranks 81st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Ecuador: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-left-on-pasture-indirect-emissions-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/ecuador/">Congo vs Ecuador: Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,139 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure left on Pasture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.