Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)
Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 35 kt against 6.16 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 28.84 kt.
That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.7 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th of 228 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.87 kt | 3.65 kt | 0.2116 kt | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 6.05 kt | 4.45 kt | 1.61 kt | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | 5.06 kt | 5.6 kt | 0.5442 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1990s | 5.49 kt | 14.58 kt | 9.09 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | 5.93 kt | 17.41 kt | 11.48 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 5.85 kt | 27.11 kt | 21.26 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 5.66 kt | 34.02 kt | 28.36 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2030s | 6.17 kt | 26.76 kt | 20.6 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2050s | 6.16 kt | 35 kt | 28.84 kt | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure management — direct emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 35 kt against 6.16 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure management — direct emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 28.84 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for manure management — direct emissions?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf