Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Manure Management — Direct emissions

Australia and New Zealand
6.16 kt
in 2050
Mexico
6.78 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
16th
Mexico rank
13th

Manure Management — Direct emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mexico
246196120052050

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 6.78 kt against 6.16 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.62 kt.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 13th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 3.87 kt 2.52 kt 1.34 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 6.05 kt 3.84 kt 2.21 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 5.06 kt 5.27 kt 0.2093 kt Mexico
1990s 5.49 kt 4.87 kt 0.621 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 5.93 kt 4.99 kt 0.9409 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 5.85 kt 5.53 kt 0.3159 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 5.66 kt 6.33 kt 0.6693 kt Mexico
2030s 6.17 kt 6.07 kt 0.0915 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 6.16 kt 6.78 kt 0.6164 kt Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — direct emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Mexico?
Mexico, at 6.78 kt against 6.16 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — direct emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
0.62 kt, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mexico rank globally for manure management — direct emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 13th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Manure Management — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Manure Management — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf