Australia and New Zealand vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure Management — Direct emissions

Australia and New Zealand
6.16 kt
in 2050
Syrian Arab Republic
0.1387 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
16th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
17th

Manure Management — Direct emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Syrian Arab Republic
0246196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 6.16 kt against 0.1387 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 6.02 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 44.4 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th of 195 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 3.87 kt 0.0153 kt 3.85 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 6.05 kt 0.0211 kt 6.03 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 5.06 kt 0.0323 kt 5.03 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 5.49 kt 0.0379 kt 5.45 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 5.93 kt 0.0497 kt 5.89 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 5.85 kt 0.0425 kt 5.81 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 5.66 kt 0.0358 kt 5.63 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 6.17 kt 0.0995 kt 6.07 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 6.16 kt 0.1387 kt 6.02 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — direct emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Syrian Arab Republic?
Australia and New Zealand, at 6.16 kt against 0.1387 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — direct emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Syrian Arab Republic?
6.02 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Syrian Arab Republic?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for manure management — direct emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 17th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure Management — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure Management — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf