Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)

Botswana
0.0622 kt
in 2050
Puerto Rico
0.065 kt
in 2050
Botswana rank
173rd
Puerto Rico rank
171st

Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • Botswana
  • Puerto Rico
0.020.040.060.080.1196120052050

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.065 kt against 0.0622 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0.0028 kt.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Botswana ranks 173rd and Puerto Rico ranks 171st of 228 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0245 kt 0.0543 kt 0.0298 kt Puerto Rico
1970s 0.0404 kt 0.0753 kt 0.0349 kt Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0428 kt 0.0711 kt 0.0283 kt Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0367 kt 0.0706 kt 0.0339 kt Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0363 kt 0.039 kt 0.0027 kt Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0271 kt 0.0304 kt 0.0033 kt Puerto Rico
2020s 0.0186 kt 0.0221 kt 0.0035 kt Puerto Rico
2030s 0.0527 kt 0.0531 kt 0.0004 kt Puerto Rico
2050s 0.0622 kt 0.065 kt 0.0028 kt Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — direct emissions, Botswana or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.065 kt against 0.0622 kt in Botswana as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — direct emissions between Botswana and Puerto Rico?
0.0028 kt, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Puerto Rico?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Botswana and Puerto Rico rank globally for manure management — direct emissions?
Botswana ranks 173rd and Puerto Rico ranks 171st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Manure Management — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/botswana/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/botswana/puerto-rico-us/">Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Manure Management — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf