China, Hong Kong SAR vs Dominica: Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.0049 kt
in 2050
Dominica
0.0043 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
214th
Dominica rank
216th

Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Dominica
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.0049 kt against 0.0043 kt in Dominica, a difference of 0.0006 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Dominica's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 214th and Dominica ranks 216th of 228 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Dominica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0371 kt 0.0022 kt 0.0349 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0525 kt 0.0022 kt 0.0503 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0.0503 kt 0.0017 kt 0.0486 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.0218 kt 0.0017 kt 0.02 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.019 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0172 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.0174 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0156 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.0179 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0161 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.0043 kt 0.0029 kt 0.0014 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 0.0049 kt 0.0043 kt 0.0006 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — direct emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Dominica?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.0049 kt against 0.0043 kt in Dominica as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — direct emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Dominica?
0.0006 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Dominica?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Dominica rank globally for manure management — direct emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 214th and Dominica ranks 216th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Dominica: Manure Management — Direct emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/dominica/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Dominica: Manure Management — Direct emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf