Serbia vs Sudan: Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O)
Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O) over time
- Serbia
- Sudan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.7774 kt against 0.7004 kt in Sudan, a difference of 0.077 kt.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 89th and Sudan ranks 91st of 228 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6166 kt | 0.698 kt | 0.0814 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.5518 kt | 0.7048 kt | 0.1531 kt | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure management — direct emissions, Serbia or Sudan?
- Serbia, at 0.7774 kt against 0.7004 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure management — direct emissions between Serbia and Sudan?
- 0.077 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Sudan rank globally for manure management — direct emissions?
- Serbia ranks 89th and Sudan ranks 91st of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Direct emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf