China, Hong Kong SAR vs Comoros: Manure Management — Emissions (CH4)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.1703 kt
in 2050
Comoros
0.1361 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
208th
Comoros rank
209th

Manure Management — Emissions (CH4) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Comoros
0123196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.1703 kt against 0.1361 kt in Comoros, a difference of 0.0342 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.3 times Comoros's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 208th and Comoros ranks 209th of 228 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Comoros Difference Ahead
1960s 1.63 kt 0.0769 kt 1.55 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 2.42 kt 0.0942 kt 2.33 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 2.39 kt 0.0848 kt 2.3 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 0.9264 kt 0.0827 kt 0.8436 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 0.9709 kt 0.0872 kt 0.8836 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 0.7479 kt 0.0902 kt 0.6577 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0.6778 kt 0.0914 kt 0.5864 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2030s 0.161 kt 0.1083 kt 0.0527 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2050s 0.1703 kt 0.1361 kt 0.0342 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Comoros?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.1703 kt against 0.1361 kt in Comoros as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Comoros?
0.0342 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Comoros?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Comoros rank globally for manure management — emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 208th and Comoros ranks 209th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Comoros: Manure Management — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/comoros/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Comoros: Manure Management — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf