Mongolia vs South Sudan: Manure Management — Emissions (CH4)
Manure Management — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Mongolia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 21.74 kt against 20.91 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0.83 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Mongolia ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 85th of 228 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.12 kt | 19.48 kt | 1.64 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 26.98 kt | 21.39 kt | 5.59 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure management — emissions, Mongolia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 21.74 kt against 20.91 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure management — emissions between Mongolia and South Sudan?
- 0.83 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and South Sudan rank globally for manure management — emissions?
- Mongolia ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 85th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf