Martinique vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), annual growth rate

Martinique
76.12 % change on previous year
in 2006
United Republic of Tanzania
3.4 % change on previous year
in 2023
Martinique rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), annual growth rate over time

  • Martinique
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-250255075196219922023

How they compare

Martinique currently reports 76.12 % change on previous year against 3.4 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 72.72 % change on previous year.

That makes Martinique's figure about 22.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Martinique ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 195 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Martinique averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Martinique United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -2.01 % change on previous year 2.46 % change on previous year 4.48 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 1.04 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1980s -0.325 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year 1.47 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1990s -1.48 % change on previous year 3.17 % change on previous year 4.65 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 1.33 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year 0.0759 % change on previous year Martinique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq), annual growth rate, Martinique or United Republic of Tanzania?
Martinique, at 76.12 % change on previous year against 3.4 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2006.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq), annual growth rate between Martinique and United Republic of Tanzania?
72.72 % change on previous year, with Martinique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Martinique and United Republic of Tanzania?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do Martinique and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq), annual growth rate?
Martinique ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Martinique vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-annual-growth-rate/martinique/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-annual-growth-rate/martinique/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Martinique vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 13,954 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.