Australia and New Zealand vs Türkiye: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Australia and New Zealand
9,200 kt
in 2050
Türkiye
994.9 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Türkiye rank
10th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Türkiye
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 9,200 kt against 994.9 kt in Türkiye, a difference of 8,205 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 9.2 times Türkiye's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Türkiye ranks 10th of 195 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 7,356 kt 865.95 kt 6,490 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 7,671 kt 882.38 kt 6,789 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 7,119 kt 878.47 kt 6,241 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 7,539 kt 735.87 kt 6,803 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 8,004 kt 618.05 kt 7,386 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 7,961 kt 762.94 kt 7,198 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 7,556 kt 975.72 kt 6,580 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 8,798 kt 854.62 kt 7,943 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 9,200 kt 994.9 kt 8,205 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Australia and New Zealand or Türkiye?
Australia and New Zealand, at 9,200 kt against 994.9 kt in Türkiye as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Australia and New Zealand and Türkiye?
8,205 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Türkiye?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Türkiye rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Türkiye ranks 10th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Türkiye: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/turkiye-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Türkiye: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf