Bangladesh vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Bangladesh
3,391 kt
in 2050
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
3,344 kt
in 2050
Bangladesh rank
21st
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
23rd

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 3,391 kt against 3,344 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 47 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 21st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 23rd of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1960s 1,644 kt 2,106 kt 461.75 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1970s 1,925 kt 3,076 kt 1,151 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1980s 1,760 kt 4,143 kt 2,383 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1990s 2,068 kt 4,123 kt 2,055 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s 2,345 kt 3,576 kt 1,232 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 2,544 kt 3,794 kt 1,250 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 2,686 kt 3,470 kt 784.13 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2030s 2,931 kt 3,465 kt 533.92 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2050s 3,391 kt 3,344 kt 46.99 kt Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Bangladesh or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Bangladesh, at 3,391 kt against 3,344 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Bangladesh and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
47 kt, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Bangladesh and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Bangladesh ranks 21st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 23rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/bangladesh/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/bangladesh/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Bangladesh vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf