Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Philippines: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Democratic Republic of the Congo
220.65 kt
in 2050
Philippines
4,765 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
16th
Philippines rank
15th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Philippines
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196120052050

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 4,765 kt against 220.65 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 4,544 kt.

That makes Philippines's figure about 21.6 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 15th of 20 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 52.15 kt 1,354 kt 1,302 kt Philippines
1970s 70.41 kt 1,517 kt 1,447 kt Philippines
1980s 84.92 kt 1,569 kt 1,484 kt Philippines
1990s 101.67 kt 1,811 kt 1,709 kt Philippines
2000s 82.96 kt 2,460 kt 2,377 kt Philippines
2010s 89.28 kt 2,454 kt 2,365 kt Philippines
2020s 106.45 kt 2,147 kt 2,041 kt Philippines
2030s 132.09 kt 3,717 kt 3,584 kt Philippines
2050s 220.65 kt 4,765 kt 4,545 kt Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Philippines?
Philippines, at 4,765 kt against 220.65 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Philippines?
4,544 kt, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Philippines?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Philippines rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 15th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Philippines: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/philippines/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Philippines: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf