Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4 CO2eq)

Ecuador
451.45 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
423.03 kt
in 2050
Ecuador rank
98th
Zimbabwe rank
101st

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4 CO2eq) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
100200300400500196120052050

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 451.45 kt against 423.03 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 28.42 kt.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 98th and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 8 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 130.02 kt 121.9 kt 8.12 kt Ecuador
1970s 177.74 kt 188.13 kt 10.39 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 231.9 kt 180.74 kt 51.17 kt Ecuador
1990s 290.72 kt 183.46 kt 107.26 kt Ecuador
2000s 283.11 kt 202.93 kt 80.19 kt Ecuador
2010s 278.26 kt 212.94 kt 65.31 kt Ecuador
2020s 249.59 kt 220.36 kt 29.22 kt Ecuador
2030s 393.61 kt 316.07 kt 77.54 kt Ecuador
2050s 451.45 kt 423.03 kt 28.42 kt Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Ecuador, at 451.45 kt against 423.03 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
28.42 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Ecuador ranks 98th and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf