Malaysia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4 CO2eq)

Malaysia
1,018 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
1,079 kt
in 2050
Malaysia rank
66th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
65th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) (CH4 CO2eq) over time

  • Malaysia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
2505007501.0k1.2k196120052050

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1,079 kt against 1,018 kt in Malaysia, a difference of 61 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Malaysia ranks 66th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 65th of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 223.93 kt 300.63 kt 76.7 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 299.88 kt 367.17 kt 67.29 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 457.26 kt 428.46 kt 28.8 kt Malaysia
1990s 591.31 kt 484.28 kt 107.03 kt Malaysia
2000s 528.06 kt 612.62 kt 84.56 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 549.7 kt 879.41 kt 329.72 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 495.11 kt 1,207 kt 712.35 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2030s 799.03 kt 843.04 kt 44.01 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2050s 1,018 kt 1,079 kt 60.77 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Malaysia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 1,079 kt against 1,018 kt in Malaysia as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Malaysia and United Republic of Tanzania?
61 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Malaysia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Malaysia ranks 66th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 65th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/malaysia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/malaysia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Malaysia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf