Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square

Costa Rica
0.0019 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.0019 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
84th
Papua New Guinea rank
85th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Papua New Guinea
0.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0019 kt per square kilometre against 0.0019 kt per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 84th and Papua New Guinea ranks 85th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square, Costa Rica or Papua New Guinea?
Costa Rica, at 0.0019 kt per square kilometre against 0.0019 kt per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square between Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square?
Costa Rica ranks 84th and Papua New Guinea ranks 85th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/papua-new-guinea/">Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.