Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 11,983 kt against 2,032 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 9,951 kt.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 5.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 228 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,302 kt | 1,437 kt | 135.12 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 1,957 kt | 1,833 kt | 124.12 kt | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | 1,648 kt | 2,300 kt | 652.21 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 1,791 kt | 3,686 kt | 1,895 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 1,946 kt | 4,761 kt | 2,816 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1,929 kt | 7,203 kt | 5,274 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1,861 kt | 8,926 kt | 7,064 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2030s | 2,025 kt | 8,355 kt | 6,329 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2050s | 2,032 kt | 11,983 kt | 9,950 kt | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 11,983 kt against 2,032 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
- What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 9,951 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 228 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf