Australia and New Zealand vs Mozambique: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Australia and New Zealand
2,032 kt
in 2050
Mozambique
2,465 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
15th
Mozambique rank
13th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mozambique
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196120052050

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 2,465 kt against 2,032 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 433 kt.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Mozambique ranks 13th of 195 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 8 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 1,302 kt 23.84 kt 1,278 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 1,957 kt 34.94 kt 1,922 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 1,648 kt 78.57 kt 1,569 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 1,791 kt 170.65 kt 1,620 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 1,946 kt 189.61 kt 1,756 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1,929 kt 194.26 kt 1,735 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 1,861 kt 216.67 kt 1,645 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 2,025 kt 1,490 kt 535.33 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 2,032 kt 2,465 kt 432.64 kt Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 2,465 kt against 2,032 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and Mozambique?
433 kt, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mozambique?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mozambique rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Mozambique ranks 13th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mozambique: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/mozambique/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mozambique: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf