Australia and New Zealand vs Pakistan: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Australia and New Zealand
2,032 kt
in 2050
Pakistan
1,901 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
15th
Pakistan rank
18th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Pakistan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 2,032 kt against 1,901 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 131 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 195 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 1,302 kt 261.93 kt 1,040 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 1,957 kt 342.78 kt 1,615 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 1,648 kt 462.8 kt 1,185 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 1,791 kt 659.62 kt 1,131 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 1,946 kt 872.81 kt 1,073 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1,929 kt 1,322 kt 606.52 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 1,861 kt 1,831 kt 30.33 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 2,025 kt 1,405 kt 620.71 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 2,032 kt 1,901 kt 131.23 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or Pakistan?
Australia and New Zealand, at 2,032 kt against 1,901 kt in Pakistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and Pakistan?
131 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Pakistan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Pakistan rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Pakistan ranks 18th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Pakistan: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/pakistan/">Australia and New Zealand vs Pakistan: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf