Burkina Faso vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Burkina Faso
956.25 kt
in 2050
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
950.37 kt
in 2050
Burkina Faso rank
41st
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
42nd

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
05001.0k1.5k196120052050

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 956.25 kt against 950.37 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 5.88 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 41st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 42nd of 228 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1960s 26.52 kt 829.93 kt 803.41 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1970s 33.14 kt 1,062 kt 1,029 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1980s 66.27 kt 1,305 kt 1,239 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1990s 131.19 kt 1,214 kt 1,082 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s 262.84 kt 1,051 kt 788.21 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 337.06 kt 1,103 kt 765.99 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 238.22 kt 1,025 kt 787.04 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2030s 609.47 kt 1,007 kt 397.82 kt Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2050s 956.25 kt 950.37 kt 5.88 kt Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Burkina Faso or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Burkina Faso, at 956.25 kt against 950.37 kt in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Burkina Faso and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
5.88 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Burkina Faso and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Burkina Faso ranks 41st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 42nd of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/burkina-faso/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/burkina-faso/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Burkina Faso vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf