El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

El Salvador
84.16 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
102.58 kt
in 2050
El Salvador rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
104th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
20406080100196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 102.58 kt against 84.16 kt in El Salvador, a difference of 18.42 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 195 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 35.27 kt 35.38 kt 0.106 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 41.55 kt 51.67 kt 10.12 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 36.3 kt 51.36 kt 15.06 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 28.09 kt 59.17 kt 31.08 kt Zimbabwe
2000s 39.87 kt 59.16 kt 19.29 kt Zimbabwe
2010s 34.58 kt 65.51 kt 30.93 kt Zimbabwe
2020s 34.59 kt 67.61 kt 33.03 kt Zimbabwe
2030s 65.38 kt 78.12 kt 12.75 kt Zimbabwe
2050s 84.16 kt 102.58 kt 18.42 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 102.58 kt against 84.16 kt in El Salvador as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
18.42 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
El Salvador ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
247 places, 14,675 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf