Mozambique vs United States of America: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Mozambique
2,465 kt
in 2050
United States of America
12,403 kt
in 2050
Mozambique rank
17th
United States of America rank
14th

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Mozambique
  • United States of America
05.0k10.0k15.0k196120052050

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 12,403 kt against 2,465 kt in Mozambique, a difference of 9,938 kt.

That makes United States of America's figure about 5.0 times Mozambique's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 17th and United States of America ranks 14th of 228 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 23.84 kt 12,720 kt 12,696 kt United States of America
1970s 34.94 kt 13,491 kt 13,456 kt United States of America
1980s 78.57 kt 12,819 kt 12,740 kt United States of America
1990s 170.65 kt 11,768 kt 11,598 kt United States of America
2000s 189.61 kt 11,617 kt 11,428 kt United States of America
2010s 194.26 kt 11,462 kt 11,268 kt United States of America
2020s 216.67 kt 11,622 kt 11,405 kt United States of America
2030s 1,490 kt 12,327 kt 10,837 kt United States of America
2050s 2,465 kt 12,403 kt 9,938 kt United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Mozambique or United States of America?
United States of America, at 12,403 kt against 2,465 kt in Mozambique as of 2050.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Mozambique and United States of America?
9,938 kt, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and United States of America?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Mozambique and United States of America rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Mozambique ranks 17th and United States of America ranks 14th of 228 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs United States of America: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/mozambique/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/mozambique/united-states-of-america/">Mozambique vs United States of America: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
261 places, 15,473 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf