Belarus vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure Management: Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O … square kilometre N2O

Belarus
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
21st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
22nd

Manure Management: Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O … square kilometre N2O over time

  • Belarus
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.004 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 21st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 170 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre, Belarus or Trinidad and Tobago?
Belarus, at 0.004 kt per square kilometre against 0.004 kt per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre between Belarus and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 21st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 22nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/belarus/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/belarus/trinidad-and-tobago/">Belarus vs Trinidad and Tobago: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.