Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Manure Management: Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O … square kilometre N2O

Equatorial Guinea
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
163rd
Saudi Arabia rank
166th

Manure Management: Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O … square kilometre N2O over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Saudi Arabia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 166th of 170 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 166th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/saudi-arabia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.