Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Manure Management: Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O … square kilometre N2O

Guatemala
0.0024 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.0021 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
48th
Guinea-Bissau rank
51st

Manure Management: Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O … square kilometre N2O over time

  • Guatemala
  • Guinea-Bissau
0.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0024 kt per square kilometre against 0.0021 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guatemala ranks 48th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 51st of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Guinea-Bissau?
Guatemala, at 0.0024 kt per square kilometre against 0.0021 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for manure management — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 48th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 51st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/manure-management-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/guinea-bissau/">Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,815 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manure Management — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.